gymn
Digest
Mon, 25 Apr 94 Volume 2 :
Issue 114
Today's Topics:
Chinese Women (2 msgs)
diving, Jenny Keim
FYI -- TDR
Journal of Performance Studies
George Atkins NCAA Women - Team Finals
Gordon Maddux
Men's AA (2 msgs)
Men's AA & Women's EF Comments (2 msgs)
Milo's Dance, Dawes' BB, etc etc
More Worlds. (4 msgs)
NCAA's on TV?
NCAA Men's stuff
NCAA Women's quotes (4 msgs)
NCAA women - event finals - complete scores
New member introduction
Random comments (2 msgs)
Rings
UCLA Men's Repreive
Women's AA comments (2 msgs)
Worlds Comments
This is a digest of the gymn@athena.mit.edu
mailing list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 07:33:48 EDT
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Chinese
Women
>Luo Li is definitely not
"Lu
Li". Will the Chinese never cease coming up with better and
more interesting
UB sets? She blew my mind (as did Mo).
If they
have a few more like these, they could be a real threat as a team in
the next couple of years!!! I was very impressed.
Mara
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 10:06:26 PDT
From: ***@eworld.com
Subject: Chinese
Women
Mara Writes:
>If they have a few more like these,
they could be a real threat as a team in
>the
next couple of years!!! I was very
impressed.
Hate to break the news to you, but the Chinese have
phenomenal depth on the
women's side. They are
also in the midst of developing some unbelievable bar
tricks.
When I was at Beijing last summer before the National Games, all of
the girls from gyms around the country were there warming
up. They were
pulling tricks in practice that they
weren't quite ready to introduce into
competition--but
that were indeed amazing.
There is greater emphasis on strength coming
from the provinces that have
former Soviet coaches
on their staffs. This will mean major improvements in
tumbling
and vault over the next two years. Watch the Chinese...
David
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 1994 09:29:44 +0600
From: ***@scoter.cdev.com
Subject:
diving, Jenny Keim
> From ***@aol.com Fri
Apr 22 23:38 CDT 1994
> Subject: Re: diving
> I recall reading an article on
Jenny that said she was at Karolyi's for 2 or
>
3 years, and had a career-ending back injury when she was 9 OR 10!!! She
> then
moved to diving.
>
> Does anyone know if this is correct? The article was a few years ago.
When
the Olympic Festival was in Minneapolis in 1990, Jenny Keim
was
the phenom of
platform diving because she was 12 or 13. The story I
remember
was that she cracked a vertebra. No details about how.
Bela
Karolyi suggested that she try diving, since Phoebe
had taken it up.
The U.S. Diving spring indoor nationals were in
Minneapolis last week.
I got to see the prelims of the women's platform. I
remember that Phoebe
made it into the finals (top
12). I don't remember what place Jenny K. had.
I didn't get to see the
finals. :(
--John
------------------------------
Date:
Sun, 24 Apr 94 22:31:54 EDT
From: ***@MIT.EDU
Subject: FYI -- TDR Journal of
Performance Studies
Hope you guys don't mind the blatant advertising,
but I got sent this, and
figured some of you might
have an interest...
(I have not connection to this journal)
--Robyn
-------
Forwarded Message
From: RUEDNBRG@ACFcluster.NYU.EDU
Subject:
announcing: TDR T141 (Spring 1994)
Dear listowner:
we thought your subscribers might be interested in
us. If you
agree, please post the following announcement. Thanks.
...You may have never
heard us, yet you may be interested in...
______________________________________________________________________
______ ______ ______
######| ######\ ######\
##| ##| ##\ ##|__##|
##| ##| ##| ######/
##| ##|__##/ ##| ##\
___________________ ##| ######/ ##| ##\_______________________
The Journal of Performance Studies T141 (Spring 1994)
TDR is a journal that explores the
diverse world of performance.
How does this relate to you? The journal emphasizes the
intercultural,
inter-disciplinary and spans numerous geographical areas and
historical
periods.
TDR addresses performance issues of every kind: theatre, music
dance,
entertainment, media, sports, politics, aesthetics of everyday
life, games,
play, and ritual. TDR is for people in the performing
arts, the
social sciences, academics, activists and theorists--anyone
interested
thinking about the "performance" paradigm. The journal, is
edited by
Richard Schechner of the Department of Performance
Studies,
New York University,
and is published quarterly by MIT Press.
Although TDR is not yet an electronic
journal, you can browse through
sample articles online and subscribe via e-mail
from the Electronic
Newsstand or directly from MIT, the publisher (see directions
below).
TDR is edited by Richard Schechner of the
Department of Performance
Studies, New York University, and published quarterly by MIT Press.
Check out our table of
contents:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
// In This Issue (T141 Spring 1994)
\\
--------------------------------------
//Comments\\
TDR & NEA: The Continuing Saga - TDR
Comment by Richard Schechner (editor)
In Memory of Utpal
Dutt - by Sudipto Chatterjee
In Memory of Robert W. Corrigan - by Richard Schechner
//Letters\\
Free Giveaway of His Plays - by Richard
Foreman
Marxism, Melodrama,
and Theatre Historiography - Dan Gerould responds
Eelka Lampe
Responds to Masakuni Kitazawa
Native Earth and Jennifer Preston - a
letter from Alan Filewood
Retiring or Recharging? - a letter from Richard E. Kramer
//Articles\\
Muhammed and
the Virgin: Folk Dramatization of Battles Between Moors
and
Christians - by Max Harris
"A Radiant Smile from the Lovely Lady": Overdetermined
Femininity in
"Ladies" Figure Skating - by Abigail M. Feder
Tomas Schmit:
A Fluxus Farewell to Perfection - interview by Gunther
Berghaus
Going Going Gone: Theatre and American
Culture(s) - by Bradley Boney
Whatever Happened to the Sleepy Mexican?: One
Way to be a Contemporary
Mexican in a Changing
World Order - by Yareli Arizmendi
The New World Border: Prophecies for the
End of the Century -
by
Guillermo Gomez-Pena
The Other
History of Intercultural Performance - by Coco Fusco
//Book Reviews\\
Women and Comedy: Rewriting the British
Theatrical Tradition (by Susan
Carlson) - reviewed by
Lizbeth Goodman
Gender in Performance: The Presentation
of Difference in the Performing
Arts (edited by
Laurence Senelick) - reviewed by Kim Marra
The
National Stage: Theatre and Culture Legitimation in England, France
and
American (by Loren Kruger) - reviewed by Susan Manning
Actors and Onlookers: Theater and
Twentieth-Century Scientific Views of
Nature (by Natalie Crohn Schmitt), The Actor's Instrument: Body, Theory,
State (by Hollis
Huston), The End of Acting a Radical View (by Richard
Hornby), Acting (by
John Harrop) - all reviewed by Phillip B. Zarrilli
Each TDR issue is filled with
photographs, artwork, and scripts that
illustrate
every article. The journal, founded in 1955, is 7 x 10, and
a 184 pages per
issue.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
// Come browse and subscribe \\
-------------------------------
1. MIT Press Online
To access MIT Press
Online Catalogs and subscription informaton:
telnet techinfo.mit.edu /Around MIT/MIT Press/journals/arts/
You
can also access MIT via Gopher in USA/massachusetts/MIT/
To subscribe to
TDR through MIT Press, send e-mail to:
journals-orders@mit.edu
MIT Press Journals, 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1399
USA.
Tel: (617) 253-2889
Fax: (617)258-6779
2. The Electronic Newsstand
You can browse
through an article from our latest issue and
obtain subscription information on the Electronic Newsstand.
On
Gopher, go to: massachusetts/MIT/Interesting Sites
to
Explore/Electronic Newsstand/all titles/TDR:The Drama Review/
To subscribe to
TDR through the Electronic Newsstand, send your name
and address to: tdr@enews.com. Or call: 1-800-40-ENEWS.
_____________________________________________________end
of msg__________
------- End of
Forwarded Message
------------------------------
Date: Mon,
25 Apr 1994 13:52 MST
From: <***@DEANS.HEALTH.UTAH.EDU>
Subject:
George Atkins NCAA Women - Team Finals
I read with interest your
comments on the Women's NCAAs here at Utah.
Thought that most of your
comments were right on target and quite fair.
However, I would like to take
issue on just a couple because I didn't see
them
the way you did. Not to flame, as I
said, most of your comments were on
the
money. The crowd expectations in
*collegiate sport* are what you saw on
Friday night. I didn't consider it ugly at all, frankly I'm pretty tired of
the
dead-pan virtually silent crowds of most gymnastics meets. As gymnastics
has
become more and more of an entertainment event - all of us better get
used to it - good or bad. Moreover, the crowd didn't behave any
differently
than they do during dual meets, which
by the way tend to outdraw the
nationals. It is
not uncommon for crowds of 15K to come for a dual meet here.
As for the cheering when a girl fell off
the beam, nothing could be further
from the
truth. The cheering was for a
performance elsewhere in the arena -
not for the
lack of one. As for the knowledge
of the crowd, I think you
won't find a crowd more knowledgable about gymnastics anywhere else in
America. Most of these fans have been following
Utah gymnastics for 10 years
or more. Trust me, they know what is going
on.
As for
the scoring, your general comments are right on. The scores are
too
high, and they do not always reflect the performance. Unfortunately,
this
has been argued ever since I began gymnastics as a competitor/coach over
25
years ago. I also thought that the
crowd helped Utah, but not by scores.
It simply helped the Utah kids
perform above themselves. I could
take issue
with judging on a whole variety of
fronts, but I thought that given the
terrain in
this case the placings were about right. I must also admit that I
wonder with judging as subjective as it is, in general, if
it might not be
more fair to consider anything
within 0.5 points in team score a tie.
Again, thanks for your report.
Bill
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 94 01:15:40
EDT
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Gordon Maddux
>BTW, I've
never received an answer to my long-held question, "Whatever
>happened to Gordon Maddux?" Is he still alive???
I thought
I mentioned I saw him do women's Pac-10's two or three years ago.
He was
awful; never left the '70's. More
recently than that, I don't know.
-- Gimnasta
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 01:35:15 EDT
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Men's AA
>Just
wanted to say that I did not agree with your comment on Soviet
men kissing each other on the lips.....that is common place
for that
>country
Well, it appears no
one understood that comment. I'm
perfectly well aware of
the fact that men kissing
each other on the lips is commonplace for Soviets.
I also don't have any
problem whatever with that custom (or with men kissing
each
other for other reasons, for that matter).
None of this, however, has
*anything* to do
with the fact that men's gymnastics has a "wus"
or "fag"
reputation in some (widespread)
circles in the US and that the kissing might
reinforce
that reputation. That is *all* I
said. This *doesn't* mean I
think it should stop, nor do I think it should stop
appearing on TV; I think
the problem is with the
bozos who see a problem with it, and those same bozos
probably
wouldn't catch on to the fact that it's commonplace in the former
USSR and
doesn't mean the men who do it are necessarily gay (and so what if
they are?). I
hope I've managed to clarify my comment.
-- Gimnasta
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 1994 12:50:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: <***@gateway.us.sidwell.edu>
Subject:
Men's AA
On Sun, 24 Apr 1994 ***@aol.com wrote (in part):
>
Scherbo falls once, screws up rings and still places
3rd?
Yeah, that was like Miller falling off beam in '93 US
Championships and
still getting third...
>
I loved the part of the '50 Worlds when they said gymnastics is about
"well
> mannered muscles." How apt! :)
The '50 Worlds
footage was pretty well placed and relevant, in my opinion.
I always find
it fascinating to see how gymnastics has changed in the past
decades. Footage
of *really* old meets like that is often pretty
humourous too (I have "Gymnastics Greatest
Stars" and I love stuff like
Vera Caslavska
winning Olympic AA with a Yami on vault, and Ludmilla
Tourischeva winning Olympic AA with a handspring-full).
Lisa
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 01:16:41 EDT
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Men's AA &
Women's EF Comments
>The guys should NOT
wear
colored pants as it totally distracts from their line.
I didn't mind Scherbo's blue; thought it looked ok. I'd stick to white (or,
rather, that kind of off-white, so it's not so blinding) if
I were a guy,
though.
A while back, Mara
challenged anyone to find a Worlds-level gymnast
approximating
Janet Jones' age (in American Anthem).
Well, Khorkina may not
*be*
30, but she looks it. =)
>but the
"dance" (I HATE to call it that)
is such an insult to "Carmen".
"Mala
guena"
>Also the most
difficult Chinese tumbling I've
ever seen (even if
she didn't hit it here).
Chen Cuiting's was
about as hard. She ended with a
double back, but she had
a whip to piked full-in and a whip to double back (and more power and
better
technique and execution than Mo).
>>Maybe
part of the reason men's gymnastics can't shake the "wus"
or "fag"
image in the US is the Soviet men kissing each other on the
lips.
>In most cultures other than the US that is very accepted behaveior (I mean
>it's not
like the slip each other the tongue or anything! It's a peck on
the
>lips...get over it). The Soviet's think that the accepted
patting of each
other's butts by American athletes
is very gross. BTW, you will never >find a
more
homophobic society than that of the USSR!
My statement wasn't intended
as a judgment on men kissing each other; it was
intended
to say exactly what it said, nothing more and nothing less.
-- Gimnasta
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 09:28:21 BST
From: ***@axion.bt.co.uk
Subject: Men's AA
& Women's EF Comments
Loads of stuff deleted that Susan said.
>How
come when Dawes misses a vault it's "bad luck" and when a
gymnast from
>another
country makes an error it's due to
"lack of concentration"?
I saw it but I don't think too much
was said about it on Eurosport
or
the BBC other than the explanation of how it happened.
Did ABC show
the vault when Shannon fell on her butt, Id love
to
hear how they explained that.
I will post later on more observations
from the worlds.
Clive
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 01:16:18 EDT
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Milo's Dance,
Dawes' BB, etc etc
>When
I said that Milos was better in dance I meant than Shannon (and the few
>others we saw)
and her own past sets. She's
at least trying to be
artistic...she IS Romanian
so that's pretty darn tough.
I really didn't think her dance was
especially *better* than Shannon's, just
a
different style, though at least it was new, and she did seem to be trying
to be artistic (in its choreography, not its performance),
both things better
than Shannon. And it certainly was way better than her own past sets.
I
think the problems with Shannon's were
that 1) the routine is just too
old
2) she didn't seem to be paying as much
attention to dancing well (probably a
result of
(1) and also of (3)) 3) the new
tumbling seemed to me to detract
from the overall
dance/tumbling integrity of the routine
4) she used to
have a series of difficult dance elements (too many
actually, but I think now
too few) and she was one
of very few who could actually complete the splits
and
turns in them and get full credit).
I actually have always liked the
routine
(in its '92-'93 incarnation) because I think 1) if Shannon were a
musical instrument, she'd be a violin playing that piece; I
think that music
is perfect for her (maybe that's
why she's having trouble finding a new one)
2) I thought the choreography, and
even the tumbling (esp when she did the
whipbacks to double full punch
front), fit the music really well and had nice
details 3) she didn't dance expressively with
her face, but I thought she
was pretty good with
her arms, was attentive to the detail (didn't just go
through
the movements, at least not as blah-ly as a Kim, but
was car
eful and
*delicate* about it).
Ok, after that lengthy expose.
. .
>Dawes vault... [ ] There should be additional deductions
for form
breaks and loss of control...at least
those things used to count.
I didn't see much by way of form breaks on
that vault, just the leg
separation on the
pre-flight. I thought her legs were
straight and together
on the post-flight (as
together as bow-legs are going to get, anyway, but her
ankles
were together). "Loss
of control"? Isn't that
the same as balance
break or fall (which is what
happens when you lose control)?
>Dawes BB.
Thank God, she
didn't get the gold!!!! Her content is good but her
>form...Ohmygawd...It couldn't be worse if she tried (at least I
hope not!).
>Never a pointed toe, or a moment on revele (up on her toes), never a
>straight leg (those flip-flops!!!! You could drive a semi
between her
legs...) I know I've said this before,
and I will undoubtably say it >again,
where the hell are the form deductions?
Couldn't
agree more -- bent and separated legs all over the ff's,
and I
scream every time Kathy J. says she should
have won at Birmingham (well, I
don't really
scream, just on the inside), but as far as her feet, the
deduction
for "poor footwork" throughout the whole exercise is,
unfortunately, a mere 0.1 (not that they take it).
>Yeah,
Brett and I noticed right off that Gogean has
recycled Silivas's
>routine
down to the dance (not there was any of that in Daniela's sets)
Are
you sure we're talking about the same gymnast? There was plenty of dance
in Silivas' routines, as I recall,
and extremely well done, and expressively,
too. '87 in particular ('88 & '89 were
kind of fluff, and '85 was too cute,
but then, so
was she), which is the one Gogean ripped off. They're just not
the
modern dance style you seem to go for.
-- Gimnasta
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 14:38:48 BST
From: ***@axion.bt.co.uk
Subject: More
Worlds.
Ok as I
promised here are some more observations from what I saw
of
the worlds.
Not bad for Neil Thomas winning his second consecutive
floor
medal, (hooray for Britain). At least it
means he gets to appear
on a Question of Sport
again, even though it was reported in the
English press as 'Thomas robbed
of gold' marvellous isnt
it
they ignore the sport for 51 weeks of the year
and suddenly
we win something and it isn't well
done Neil, its Thomas robbed
of Gold no wonder
people think British people are whingers.
Everybody
always quotes the consectutive Gold medal winners but
how many consectutive
silver medal winners have their been probably
loads
but it would be an interesting fact to know.
A number of gymnasts
seemed to be having difficulty with their
vaults
they all seemed to veer
dangerously off to the right which is
where the
floor finishes and there is a nice drop, luckily they
all
managed to save themselves before they got that far but
is
that usual for them all to go the same direction.
There was an
almighty crash when one of the GBR competitors
Powell I think his name was
got entangled with his release on the
rings and
plummeted to the ground which he hit head first I was
surprised
he actually wasnt hurt more by the impact but he was
fine
except he had concussion and a large lump
about the size of
a tennis ball on his head. But
he did get up and walked
away with a little bit of
help and then went on to finish competing
certainly
can't fault his dedication.
There was a nice speech by Nadia at the
start of the Women's
all-around competition about
the money she was giving to Romania,
which no
doubt ABC forgot to include in their broadcast. There
was
also about 15 minutes of Aboriginal tribal stuff which was
quite interesting certainly different.
I still
think the scoring was pretty much up the spout
again
there plenty of routines with more difficulty in them
which
were being marked down and there were less difficult routines
being marked higher. But it wasnt
as widespread as it had been
in qualifying,
perhaps it evens itself eventually but it does
look
pretty odd when one gymnast does basically nothing and gets
a high mark and then another gymnast does loads of really
difficult
things and gets a low mark.
Clive.
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 10:27:14 EDT
From: <***@MIT.EDU>
Subject: More
Worlds.
Clive said:
>... but he was
fine
>except he had concussion and a large lump
about the size of
>a tennis ball on his head.
But he did get up and walked
>away with a
little bit of help and then went on to finish competing
>certainly can't fault his dedication.
Wait a
minute! This guy continued
competing with a concussion!?!
That doesn't sound
very bright, or very safe. I'm
surprised they
allowed that!
--Robyn
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 16:07:27 BST
From: ***@axion.bt.co.uk
Subject: More
Worlds.
>Wait a minute!
This guy continued competing with a concussion!?!
>That
doesn't sound very bright, or very safe.
I'm surprised they
>allowed that!
Aha,
now that was a freudian slip and a half on my part,
first
off he didnt nose
dive or anything downwards he belly flopped the
ground
but his head definately hit the ground first. Now the
various
coaches all helped him toddle off and he
must have been checked over
by a doctor for
breakages. If you can break an arm falling over
in
the
bath you can sure as anything break an arm
falling from that
distance.
Now I guess
he returned later probably much later to do a vault,
which
was quite a decent one actually considering but the way it
was shown
on the BBC showed him doing it
instantaneously. Hence the reason why
I said he continued competing because
thats all I know about the
incident
at the moment, I missed it on Eurosport but I would
guess
they didn't let him return till he felt ok
and they were sure he
was ok and had been checked out by a doctor. If anyones that
interested I can
do a time check on it for you.
Even so he still had one humungous bump
on his face which had
swelled
to
such epic proportions that his right eye was barely
open which cannot
be called really a good
idea.
Clive
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 14:44:42 EDT
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: More
Worlds.
>There was an almighty crash when one of the GBR
competitors
Powell I think his name was got entangled with his release on
the
rings and plummeted to the ground which he hit
head first I was
surprised he actually wasnt hurt more by the impact but he was fine
except he had concussion and a large lump about the size of
a tennis ball on his head. But he did get up and walked
away with a little bit of help and then went on to finish
competing
certainly can't fault his
dedication.
Actually it was Paul Bowler and the really weird thing is
that he did it last
year too (fall of rings that
is). I happened to be sitting next to him the
day
after it happened (in '93 that is) and after a while said "Would you
be
offended if I asked you what happened"?
His coach dissolved into giggles but
he just
smiled and said "No...I really have no idea...I was fine one minute
and the next I was laying on my back." I wonder if
there has ever been
consecutive world's rings
("you know rings those two little round thing you
never
let go off...") falls before?
At least it wasn't Craig Heap...still me
fav name for a Brit guy who can barely walk from
event to event without
falling down.
Susan
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 10:47:44 EDT
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: NCAA's on
TV?
Anyone know if and when(and what channel,etc) NCAA's will be televised?
-- Gimnasta
------------------------------
Date:
Sun, 24 Apr 1994 22:17:34 -0500 (CDT)
From: <***@owlnet.rice.edu>
Subject:
NCAA Men's stuff
Some quotes from the parallel AP story on the men's
championships:
Dennis Harrison, who scored 58.20 to win the AA on
Friday, scored
58.45 in team finals on Saturday. He then went on, on Saturday night,
to finish in the top six on *every* event, thus earning
All-American
status in all seven categories (AA
and six events). I wonder
when's
the last time someone did that? That's just insane!
Harrison:
"I just went out and tried to help lead."
Nebraska coach
Francis Allen: "I didn't think they could do better
than
they did in the Big Eight (meet), but they did. The thing I like
is the team hit all of its routines."
Stanford
coach Sadao Hamada: "Nebraska did a good job. I
was very
impressed. Every time I looked up,
Nebraska was hitting a routine."
Chris Lamorte,
U-New Mexico, who successfully defended his rings
title:
"I felt a lot more pressure this time. My freshman year I
didn't feel everyone was after me. I felt like I was after
everybody.
Now, I have everyone trying to beat me. Plus, I had my mom here
this
time. She wasn't here last time and I wanted
to do well for her."
Mark Booth, Stanford, who won floor:
"Considering that I was out with
a torn achilles tendon last year and I wasn't expected to compete
at
all this year, it was a bit of sweet revenge."
------------------------------
Date:
Sun, 24 Apr 1994 22:09:52 -0500 (CDT)
From: <***@owlnet.rice.edu>
Subject:
NCAA Women's quotes
Hey friends,
Here are some tidbits about
the NCAA Women's Championships that I
thought were
worth quoting from a recent AP story:
Hope Spivey-Sheeley's
10.0 on floor exercise in event finals was the
27th ten
of her career. She now
"awaits a new, larger wedding ring as
the
reward promised by her husband for a victorious collegiate
gymnastics finale," said the AP article.
Spivey,
with undoubtably the worst gymnastics quote I've ever
seen:
"My husband (Dale) and I had a bet because I have always been
selfish
and wanted a bigger diamond wedding ring.
He's going to be very poor."
The Champs drew 8,382 attendance for
Event Finals, and 31,480 for the
three-day total
(four sessions). Last year's
attendance of 17,329 was
the old (and demolished)
record.
Soph. Jenny Hansen of Kentucky, who has won the AA twice and
also won
two event titles this year, is just one
title short of the cumulative
record of five NCAA
titles, held by Missy Marlowe.
Your typically insightful commentary
found in newspapers: "Hansen's
beam routine
-- highlighted by triple backflips and a twisting reverse
dismount -- earned a 9.975 score from the judges."
[Wow,
triple backs on the beam?! No wonder NCAA scores are
so high. I
wonder
what a "twisting reverse" is...]
Rachele
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 1994 00:21:58 +0800
From: ***@Eng.Sun.COM
Subject: NCAA
women's quotes
Rachele writes:
Spivey, with undoubtably
the worst gymnastics quote I've ever seen:
"My husband (Dale) and I had a bet
because I have always been selfish
and wanted a bigger diamond wedding ring. He's
going to be very poor."
You can blame that one on Lori
Strong. Not that she said it, but
Lori
made Hope tell all to the press (or *she* was
going to.) She went on
to say that wasn't the real reason. Then I believe she mentioned her
plans for next year. Then she got emotional again.
Speaking
of press, I forgot to post any of the press conference stuff.
Nobody said
anything that memorable, actually, but I'll dig anything
interesting
up tomorrow.
-George
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 14:30:45 EDT
From: <***@BBN.COM>
Subject: NCAA
Women's quotes
Rachele quotes an AP
story:
>Your typically insightful commentary found in newspapers:
"Hansen's
>beam routine -- highlighted by
triple backflips and a twisting reverse
>dismount
-- earned a 9.975 score from the judges."
Not to excuse their
sloppiness, but I would guess that they
meant
three backflips in a row (like the ever popular
"layout,
layout, step out"), and thought that "triple back
flips" would convey that. (Feh.) I'd also guess that "twisting
reverse" was meant to tell the reader that she did some
amount of
back flipping with some amount of
twisting in her dismount.
(That really narrows the possibilities, doesn't
it? :-)
Of course, trying to translate sloppy journalism into
communicative
prose is actually a waste of
time....
Can someone like George tell us if Hansen's beam set had
these things it it? (Just curious.)
>>Kathy
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 1994 12:55:25 +0800
From: ***@Eng.Sun.COM
Subject: NCAA
Women's quotes
I don't have my notes with me right now, but I think I
took notes of
Jenny Hansen's beam and floor routines. I can post them when I go
home tonight.
-George
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 1994 11:49:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: <***@gateway.us.sidwell.edu>
Subject:
NCAA women - event finals - complete scores
On Sun, 24 Apr 1994,
George Atkins wrote:
>
Floor
>
1. Hope Spivey-Sheeley, Georgia, 10.0.
> 2. Kim Kelly, Alabama,
9.975.
> 3. Tina
Brinkman, Arizona St., 9.95.
> 4. Becky Erwin, Auburn,
9.925.
> 5. Jenny Hansen, Kentucky,
9.9.
> tie Suzanne Metz, Utah, 9.9.
> tie
Aimee Trepanier, Utah, 9.9.
> tie
Megan Caudle, Utah, 9.9.
That's absolutely crazy!! They really do need to do something
about the
scoring in NCAA Women's gymnastics. The top *8* places are 9.9 or
above,
while at the World Championships, there are
3 scores of 9.9 or above in 4
days of
competition! Plus, the last 10 in
FIG competition was
Milosovici's 10 on floor in the '92 Olympics. Last year, weren't there
like 6 10's at NCAA's?
This is getting really out
of hand.
Lisa
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 17:39:31 BST
From: ***@ic.ac.uk
Subject: New member
introduction
Hi there. This is the first time I'm sending anything to
this forum so I hope
that I'm doing this
correctly! Here's a bit of info about myself:
Name :
Sherwin
Age : 23
Sex :
Male
Nationality : British (Hong Kong)
Lives : Uxbridge, Middlesex, England
Occupation
: Student (studying at Imperial College, University of London,
for
a PhD degree in Electrical Engineering)
Gymnastics Interests
:
Started following gym after seeing Tatiana Gutsu did an amazing full-twist
tuck-back
somersault on beam in 1991. Since then I have been to Worlds 1993,
and Birmingham Classics 1993, following international womens gymnastics mainly.
Last year I started writing
to penpals (I have about 10) all over the world,
and that was when I started exchanging photos and
videos of past meets and
learned more about the
sport. I now have over 30 tapes (of 4 hours each) of
past
meets ( womens only on VHS-PAL format) dating from
1970s up to date
(over 11 hours of Worlds 1994
coverage). My favourites include the 'Soviets',
Romanians and the British (!). I don't do gym myself
though.
Others :
I don't know how many subscribers are
from this part of the world, but I
have friends
who have been to the GBR v ROM meet earlier in April '94 and can
relate her experience of that meet into this group. (Anybody
interested in it?)
It's quite a small meet so I don't know if you have
heard of it. I also have a
friend who went to
Worlds 94 in Brisbane so I can relate her experience as well.
My favourite gymnasts at the moment (liable to change every
day!) include
Karin Szymko (GBR), Elodie Lussac (FRA), Dina Kochetkova (RUS),
Annika Reeder (GBR), Yelena Piskoun (BLR), Gina Gogean (ROM),
Oksana Fabrichnova (RUS), Andrea Cacovean (ROM), Claudia Rusan
(ROM),
Liliya Podkopayeva
(UKR), Olga Yurkina (BLR), Roza
Galieva (UZB),
Ekaterina Vandysheva
(RUS), Joanna Hughes (AUS), Irina Golub (RUS),
Dominique Moceanu (USA), Ruth Moniz
(AUS), Svetlana Khorkina (RUS), etc.
I
can go on forever. My favourite male gymnast is Neil
Thomas (well done Neil
getting another silver on
FX!). I do watch mens gymnastics but do not record
them. I also like rhythmic gymnastics (Larissa Lukianenko (BLR) especially)
and
Sports Acros. I subscribe to a few international
gymnastics magazines (am I
allowed to mention
their names ?) to keep me up-to-date somehow.
I
like a lot of other sports too : British soccer,
figure skating, cricket,
F-1 motor racing, etc.
I
guess I should stop here and am looking forward to participate in this
forum!
Please tell me newbie if I've done something wrong!
Sherwin
Ho
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 1994
10:03:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: ***@ocvaxa.cc.oberlin.edu
Subject: Random
comments
I
am speaking as probably the only gymn member who
hasn't seen an ounce
of coverage or read a word in
the press about anything that went on over the
weekend.
However, I can add a few things...
1)
Dennis and someone else (I forget who) are correct - Dawes' music is
Malaguena, and that was never used in the original opera
version of Carmen. I
have my mom looking up the
composer. However, it is used in many fantasies on
the
Carmen themes, so many of us (esp. those who play violin!) always think
it's a part of the opera.
2) Jenny Heim was a member of Karolyi's young elite "hope" group.
Karolyi suggested diving in a meeting with her & her
mom after doctors told her
she could suffer
permanent neurological damage from injuries and stresses on
her neck if she continued in gymn.
They were both very complimentary of Karolyi.
I ssaw a profile of her several years ago on an ESPN young
athletes show whose
title I cannot remember at the
moment. I thought it was a bit weird to take up
platform
diving in order to AVOID possible recurring neurological damage.
Springboard,
yes, but PLATFORM!?!?!
3) My jaw is still sore from it
hitting the keyboard when gimnasta
spoke of the .2 bonus in Shannon's front tumbling.
4) Huilan Mo sounds insane
5) Huilan Mo
sounds like she'd be a perfect fit at Cypress
6) Perhaps Strong was going to
announce it in the press conference
anyway, but a
big BLAH to Hope for being stupidly materialistic.
7) Way to get German citizenship
BELENKY!!!! WHOOOO!!!! He was always
one of my
favorites.
8)
STILL no one, after over 130 mail messages, has mentioned what vault
Dom
was doing. Yo, people, I'm waiting for my mom to send
me the tape which
will take until about July, so
just tell me directly or whatever, what vault
she's
doing.
9)
Did the coaches replace Amanda with Larissa in AA finals or what?
10) The judges
don't get paid? Just travel? WHAT???!!!
11) i want to be in Clive'ss shoes and totallly
oversaturated in
coverage. If they can have a
cartoon network, why can't they just satellite
feed
Eurosport directly?
12) Ha ha to
Dom & Kelli for thinking she could get a medal for a bar
routine with only a Shopshnikova
in it. Duh....
I
like Dom a lot, and her beam a lot too, but what the heck were they
thinking?!!!!
More
later... Cara
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 94 14:44:48
EDT
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Random comments
>STILL no
one, after over 130 mail messages, has mentioned what vault Dom was
doing. Yo, people, I'm waiting for
my mom to send me the tape which will take
until about July, so just tell me directly or whatever, what
vault she's
doing.
Well now you'll get a
zillion messages like this but it was a Tychenko 1
and
1/2 the same vault she fell on last year...
Susan
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 1994 13:05:55 +1000
From: <***@pharm.med.upenn.edu>
Subject:
Rings
>
>Chechi is God (on rings
anyway!).
>
>-- Gimnasta
Just
for your information - if you would like to see the god of gods - on
rings - watch for the Men's NCAA and Chris LaMorte from New Mexico (9.9).
Saturday night they
scored the men on the International level (base score
9.0) and LaMorte would have out-scored
and out-wowed Chechi (and I love
Chechi) 3 inverts all flat - and that is
only a sample.
Mayland
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 1994 12:57:29 +1000
From: <***@pharm.med.upenn.edu>
Subject:
UCLA Men's Repreive
>The UCLA men's
program was granted a stay of execution when they had their
>day in court. A judge ruled that the program could NOT be
terminated. Several
>stipulations, such as UCLA
can schedule no meets at the present time,
>accompany
the decision and a further court date of May 16th (day after my
>b-day by the by)
is set. All in all it looks like Yefim Furman
will have a
>job next year after all!
>
>Susan
At
NCAA (Men's) I had a chance to speak with Peter Vidmar
- an interesting
conversation to say the
least. I don't know how many of you
know this, but
he was inducted into the UCLA hall
of fame and was asked to be the fund
raising rep
for UCLA this year.
He
had the opportunity to speak to the *fat cats* and made a great speech -
(not verbatim ... I find it highly ironic that you chose me
to be in the
hall of fame the same year that you
decided to cut Men's gymnatics - the
program that made me worthy of being in the hall of
fame...
I must say the meet was almost solid talk of Men's gymnastics
having their
championships
dropped. In the next few weeks I
will be putting letters on
the system. Anyone willing to download them, and
fill in the blanks will
be helping Men's
gymnastics - greatly. We need to
have this coming from
all areas - International
attention will help NCAA realize that this
program
must survive if we are to continue to be represented on the
international scene, and nationally - women followers as
well as men are
needed.
I have so much more
information from this weekend I can share - Right now I
want
to post this, more to follow on this CRISIS!
Mayland
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 09:05:47 BST
From: ***@axion.bt.co.uk
Subject: Women's
AA comments
Susan said:
>Milos (was her beam generous to make
up for FX?).
If you thought her beam was generous in the AA
competition then
you should have seen what she
did for qualifying. The words
not very impressive
readily spring to mind.
Clive. (absolutely
knackered now after watching almost 25hrs
of
coverage)
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 25 Apr
1994 11:35:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: <***@gateway.us.sidwell.edu>
Subject:
Women's AA comments
On Sun, 24 Apr 1994, Lori wrote (part):
>
gimnasta writes:
>
> {comments on Shannon's floor routine}
>
>
> > Gina Gogean's middle pass is
ridiculous, and did anyone notice her routine
> > (at
least the first half) is a Silivas ripoff? Down to
the steps on her
> > heels in the
corner. At least it's an
improvement over her last routine.
>
> I thought it looked
familiar. I thought that both she
and Milosovici
> looked
like that had no desire to be there.
There was absolutely no
> expression in
their routines.
Yeah, plus their music was
awful!! As my father said (during
the last
part of Milosovici's
routine),"It sounds like Led Zepplin." Milosovici's
old music wasn't much better, but I kind of liked Gogean's old music.
While we're on this
subject...Miller is in *dire* need of some new music!
So is Borden, if she
still has that celestial-sounding music.
Lisa
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 09:09:13 BST
From: ***@axion.bt.co.uk
Subject: Worlds Comments
>Give
me pay-per-view! I guess we should
be happy that ABC
televised the
>Worlds
promptly, but showing a total of 17 routines from 7
gymnasts
?!?
>Will today's coverage of the women's EF and men's AA be as
sketchy?
I'm
>betting yes.
Did I ever
mention the fact Eurosport is free.
I thought that would
probably cheer alot of you up.
Clive
------------------------------
End
of gymn Digest
******************************