gymn
Digest
Tue, 26 Apr 94 Volume 2 :
Issue 115
Today's Topics:
ABC/Worlds (3 msgs)
Chinese Women
Comaneci Sponsoring Romanian gymnastics
GBR v ROM impressions (19th March 1994)
going to USA Champs?
More Worlds.
NCAA women
NCAA women - event finals - complete scores
Pak salto
Random comments
Tickets to Nationals
TV schedule (2 msgs)
Women's AA comments
World comments (2 msgs)
This is a
digest of the gymn@athena.mit.edu mailing list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date:
Tue, 26 Apr 94 10:56:51 EDT
From: ***@eos.ncsu.edu
Subject:
ABC/Worlds
Greetings, fellow Gymn'ers
I
must agree with what seems to be a consensus that, well, Susan said it
best: "ABC sucks. . . " I do admit as to liking the black and
white
highlights of the old gymnastics in the
bumpers as ABC came back from
commercial,
though.
The question I want to know is since that there is a major
time
difference between here and Australia
(something like 15 hours) plus
the events were
well over before airing here in the USA, couldn't ABC
have
done better editing and shown the better gymnasts of the meet?
Dina Kochetkova won 3 medals and she was only really given air time on
Sunday's Event Finals. We know that Shannon is the best in the
world,
but does that mean that none of the other
gymnasts are worthy enough
to be seen on American
TV? I was sitting in my den and
thinking,
"Hey, I would be willing to sit through John Tesh's dumb questions if
I could actually see some good
coverage."
Just a little fuming,
--Brent
------------------------------
Date:
Tue, 26 Apr 94 16:45:08 BST
From: ***@axion.bt.co.uk
Subject:
ABC/Worlds
-Brent fumed
>The question I want to know is since
that there is a
>major time difference between
here and Australia (something
>like 15 hours)
plus the events were well over before airing
>here
in the USA, couldn't ABC have done better editing and
>shown the better gymnasts of the meet?
I was
wondering did they show on ABC any of the on screen graphics
from Brisbane highlighting in particular where USA
competitors were
positioned, you know like they
had a top ten and then below they
detailed the
people who came in xxxth place who were
Americans.
Clive.
------------------------------
Date:
Tue, 26 Apr 94 14:58:22 EDT
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: ABC/Worlds
>
We know that Shannon is the best in the world, but does that
mean that none of the other gymnasts are worthy enough to be
seen >on
American TV?
How do we know Shannon is the best in
the world if we didn't get to
see anyone else (Kochetkova esp)?
-- Gimnasta
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 16:12:22 EDT
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Chinese
Women
I must say that when it comes to sheer quality of movement that
NO ONE
comes near the Chinese girls. Their beam
sets flow effortlessly from
one move to another.
Whenever they intro a new trick it's done
wonderfully
(toes pointed, legs straight, choreography extraordinary,
each hand position perfect). On FX there tumbling may be
only average
and their dance hookey
and yet still you're transfixed simply by the
way
they move. It's so graceful and yet
so natural...
I think that except for mental toughness the Chinese are
already a
team to be reckoned with. Ever since they joined the world scene
in
1979 (and even before) they've revolutionized the uneven bars and
Yang
Bo single handedly reinvented the beam...
They're probably
the number one Compo team in the world...only the
judges
seem not to notice. If they can get their heads up to par with
their skills then the world championship could be
theirs...they're
obviously far more accomplished
artistically than the Romanians if
only they can
gain some consistency.
Susan
------------------------------
Date:
Tue, 26 Apr 94 16:52:43 BST
From: ***@ic.ac.uk
Subject: Comaneci
Sponsoring Romanian gymnastics
Hi all,
Since Nadia Comaneci
had announced that she is going to put some money
into
Romanian gymnastics, can I make a suggestion and invest on a
'School of
Expressions' to put some life into the Romanian routines!
Gee, they're so
dull! Gogean, Milosovici, Hatagan, etc. you name it
and
you get a boring expression. They are great gymnasts, no doubt,
but a bit of life, a smile here and there can make the
routines so
much more enjoyable! (Mind you, Nadia
was very stony faced herself at
her time) Ask
Daniela Silivas to help!
Sherwin
------------------------------
Date:
Tue, 26 Apr 94 11:31:52 BST
From: ***@ic.ac.uk
Subject: GBR v ROM
impressions (19th March 1994)
Hi all. I've only been member of Gymn for a day but here's my first
contribution.
Here's an edited version of the experience of my friend
Rachael Twomey (15 years old) who went to the GBR v ROM meet in
Liverpool,
England,on the 19th March,
1994: (This is a womens only
event
and also remember that this is just before Worlds'94 so some of
the routines on show were NEW in a sense.)
' Well, we arrived, I
bought a programme and was delighted (and
surprised) to see the following Romanians listed : Milosovici,
Hatagan, Gogean and Cacovean! Yes! Also
there was Simona Amanar
and
Daniela Maranduca (sp?).
You'll get a
surprise when you read the scores although it is
no
surprise that Milosovici won. She did her usual beam
and bars
rotuines, the Yurchenko-half vault and her Worlds'93 floor tumbles
to
new AWFUL music! She made no real mistakes
except for going out of
bounds on floor (and she
still got a 9.675!). However I thought Milo's
scores
were very generous, especially her 9.975 on BB!
Gogean finished fourth - it would have been second except
that
she fell off the bars attempting the Marinich (She also did two
Tkatchevs).
On beam, Gogean has added a new acro
series to her usual
routine - flip to
full-twisting tucked back (!) and she was very
steady
on it. On vault Gogean did a brilliant Yuchenko one and a half
for
9.95 and she too has new floor music. It starts off as Silivas's
music from Worlds'87, then changes halfway through. She's
still using
the dreaded forward tumbles
though!
Cacovean my fave senior Romanian
is looking very, very
polished. She is also so
tiny, I couln't get over it and so cute she
could be eight years old! She did the 9.9 tariff handspring
front
piked-half vault
very cleanly, though the landing needs some work. Her
UB is as good as ever
and she has a floor routine with music that
isn't
great but that has cute choreography and great tumbles - whip to
tucked full-in; whip to two and a half twists; full-in
tucked
(stuck!). Cacovean
finished fifth, a surprise, because after a
perfect
beam routine she sat down on her dismount landing! I was so
disappointed! As
it was Cacovean's beam score was 9.350, so just
think what it could've been if she hadn't fallen!
Due to Gogean and Cacovean's mistakes, Hatagan finished
second. She did a successfull
Marinich on bars (and a Geinger
and a
Tkatchev!), the Yurchenko
half vault, her floor tumbles from Nikon
Grand Prix but with new music
(awful, again!) and her BB is very clean
and it's
upgraded. She does split leap, backflip quarter turn to
handstand,
then circles the beam (like you do in the backflip across
the beam). She also does punch front to immediate backflip
quarter to
handstand.
I should say Milosovici will be competing at
Brisbane but who
out of Gogean,
Cacovean and Hatagan will
be the reserve, I don't know.
They were all so good! I had a great, great
time!
After
the great competition was the presentation, then the
march
out. Except half the audience marched out with the gymnasts in
an attempt to get autographs! There was total chaos! I could
see this
so I went back inside the arena while my
dad was talking to a British
gym coach who had
coached him in rugby 20 years ago! Then I went back
out
to the lobby area and the crowd had disappeared. There was just me
and three other girls. One of the girls opened the door to
where the
gymnasts were and the man at the door
told her it was private. Then
another man, who looked official said 'Excuse me these are
my
granddaughters.' And the 3 girls were allowed
in! Don't ask me why!
And I sneaked in, too!
It was amazing!
Just the four of us and the Romanian team! I
was so excited I didn't know what to do. When my shock
subsided, I
asked Cacovean
for her autograph and when she stood next to me she
barely
stood up to my elbow, she's so short! And she wears eye make-up
quite heavily that I hadn't noticed before. The other girls
were
swarming Milo so I got Gogean's
autograph, then Simona Amanar's,
then
Hatagan's then Maranduca's!
It was SO EXCITING!! Before I could get
Milo's autograph, we were chucked
out and the gymnasts were moved into
the arena so
everyone could queue for autographs. But the queue for
Milo's was too long
and my dad had to get home.
Milo
was so relaxed and smiling a lot during the autograph
signing.
When my sister gave Milo a poster to sign she snatched
Hatagan's
pen from her, while she was writing with it and Nadia
laughed!
I never knew she knew how to laugh! Cacovean was
quite
matter-of-fact and expressionless but occassionally gave this really
cute
smile and poor Gogean looked as bored and miserable
as ever. A
lot of poeple
were overlooking Gina and just getting Milo's autograph
but
for me, Milo's was the only one I didn't get!
I still can't believe that I got into
that private room and
gotautographs
and spoke to them! (OK, so it was only 'please sign' and
'thank you' but until my German improves it's not advisable
to take up
a second foreign language!) You know Gogean is surpirsingly short
in
person too and she's into green eye make-up.
GBR
v ROM '94 : RESULTS (Romania)
VT UB BB FX Total
Lavinia Milosovici 9.925 9.800 9.975 9.675 | 39.375
Nadia
Hatagan 9.725 9.700 9.800 9.700 | 38.925
Simona Amanar 9.825 9.550 9.700 9.725 | 38.800
Gina
Gogean 9.950 9.100 9.850 9.750 | 38.650
Andrea
Cacovean 9.750 9.675 9.350 9.700 | 38.475
Daniela
Mararduca 9.600 * 9.750 9.750 | 29.100
* = did not compete'
I hope this isn't too long and
thanks again to Rachael Twomey for her
account.
------------------------------
Date:
Tue, 26 Apr 1994 11:38:07 -0500 (CDT)
From: <***@owlnet.rice.edu>
Subject:
going to USA Champs?
from the USAG BBS: [note
that Champs and Congress are being held
simultaneously
this year]
USA Gymnastics National Congress
Special Airline
Discounts
USA Gymnastics has selected Opryland International Travel
(OIT) to be
your official travel agency for this
years Congress
Opryland International Travel:
> Is
conveniently located in the Opryland Hotel!
> Offers 10
percent off all fares on American Airlines
> Provides
each traveller with $200,000 flight insurance at no cost.
> Gives you FREE AIRPORT
SHUTTLE service ($13 savings per
person) when you book your flight with OIT.
BONUS:
Every Attendee who purchaces their airline ticket
from OIT,
regardless of airline, will have a
chance to win a round trip ticket
on American
Airlines. Call OIT at
1-800-677-9526 from 8am-5pm
(Monday-Friday) and 9am-4pm (Saturdays) central
time or FAX
1-615-871-5794
------------------------------
Date:
Tue, 26 Apr 94 09:29:38 BST
From: ***@axion.bt.co.uk
Subject: More
Worlds.
Susan pointed out:
>Actually it was Paul Bowler and the
really weird thing is
>that he did it last
year too (fall of rings that is). I
>happened
to be sitting next to him the day
after it happened
>(in '93 that is) and after
a while said "Would you be
>offended if I
asked you what happened"? His coach dissolved into
>giggles but he just smiled and said "No...I really have
no idea...I
>was fine one minute and the next
I was laying on my back."
>I wonder if there has
ever been consecutive world's rings
>("you
know rings those two little round thing you never let go
off...")
>falls before?
Well
Powell and P Bowler are fairly similar, I can be
excused for
having a poor memory I did
watch alot of TV over the weekend. Anyway
you worked out who he was.
Clive.
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 1994 13:32:04 +0800
From: ***@Eng.Sun.COM (George Atkins)
Subject:
NCAA women
Thanks for the feedback, Bill. It's surely no slight on the Utah
crowd for being rowdy (like I said, this is the first time
I've been
to a National meet where the home team
was in the finals.) It's
inevitable as (or if) gymnastics becomes more popular. It's such a
different
scene, though! At Cal, you *might*
get 200 people there (if
you give away tickets
;^). Usually the gymnasts on the
floor cheering
drowns out the fans. I guess I've gotten used to that kind
of
environment. You'd have to admit that it is a lot
easier to
concentrate!
But, more
importantly, you say:
I
could take issue
with judging on a whole variety of fronts, but I thought
that given the
terrain in this case the placings
were about right. I must also admit
that I
wonder
with judging as subjective as it is, in general, if it might not be
more fair to
consider anything within 0.5 points in team score a tie.
That kind of
made me wonder, too (only allowing a certain accuracy for
the final team scores.)
Do you think, though, that people would
accept
such a thing?
-George
------------------------------
Date:
Tue, 26 Apr 94 09:17:08 EDT
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: NCAA women -
event finals - complete scores
Lisa writes:
>days of competition!
Plus, the last 10 in FIG competition was
Milosovici's
10 on floor in the '92 Olympics. Last year, weren't there
>like 6 10's at NCAA's?
Milosovici's
10 was far from deserved; but more importantly, while the
FIG is no longer
handing out 10's, look at the number of scores
between
9.9 and 10 last cycle. Everybody
was overscored and stuffed
into
that space of a single tenth, and they had as many ties as NCAA.
I don't
have too many results for '93 and '94, just general
impressions,
and it does seem better, but I'd still look at the scores
between 9.8 and 9.9.
This is in *no* way meant as a defense of NCAA
scoring,
just want say FIG isn't much better in terms of taking
deductions;
it's just harder to start out of a 10.
-- Gimnasta
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 14:09:43 PDT
From: ***@geoworks.com
Subject: Pak salto
Kathy writes:
> girl
who did the Pak salto release on bars.)
What is a Pak salto?
I've
heard the name passed around in a bunch of mail lately,
but
have no clue as to what it is.
Dave
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 94 16:12:13
EDT
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Random comments
>Tychenko 1 and 1/2 the same vault she fell on last
year...
Umm make that a Yurchenko 1 and 1/2
...my typing just gets worse and
worse
Susan
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 1994 18:04:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: <***@gateway.us.sidwell.edu>
Subject:
Tickets to Nationals
Does anyone know anything about how, when, where
to purchase tickets
for this year's
Nationals? Also, any ideas about
when tickets for '96
Olympic Trials or Olympics go on sale?
Thanks,
Lisa
------------------------------
Date:
Tue, 26 Apr 1994 11:36:17 -0500 (CDT)
From: <***@owlnet.rice.edu>
Subject:
TV schedule
Here is the calendar of TV events as published by USAG on
their Delphi
BBS:
EVENT
LOCATION DATE DATE TO
NET TIME
HELD BE
AIRED (EDT)
World
Championship Mens Indiv.
Events. Australia 4/94 4/30/94 ABC 4:30
NCAA Womens
Championships
Salt Lake
4/94 5/8/94 CBS 2:00
NCAA Womens Championships
Salt Lake
4/94 5/15/94 CBS 2:00
Rhythmic Nat'l
Championships (USAG) Uniondale 5/94 5/22/94 CBS 2:00
Hilton Challenge (Men/Women) Phoenix 5/94 6/4/94 ABC 4:30
(China / Belarus / USA)
Rhythmic
Nat'l Championships (USAG) Uniondale 5/94 6/19/94 CBS 4:00
Budget Rent-A-Car
Invitational
Worcester
6/94 6/19/94 NBC 2:30
(Romania vs. USA)
US Olympic Festival
(Men/Women/Rhyth) St. Louis 7/94 7/3/94 CBS 2:00
US Olympic Festival
(Men/Women/Rhyth) St. Louis 7/94 7/9/94 CBS 4:00
US Olympic Festival
(Men/Women/Rhyth) St. Louis 7/94 7/10/94 CBS 2:00
Hilton Challenge
(Men/Women) Repeat
Phoenix 5/94 8/20/94 ABC 4:30
Coca Cola National
Championships (M/W)
Nashville 8/94 8/27/94 NBC 8:00
Coca Cola National
Championships (M/W)
Nashville 8/94 8/28/94 NBC 7:00
Rhythmic International
Invitational
TBA 9/94 10/29/94 TBA TBA
World Championships - TEAM (M/W)
Dortmund 11/94
12/3/94 NBC TBA
TBA = To Be Announced
All start times given are Eastern
Daylight Time. Consult TV listings for
your
area.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 1994
10:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: <***@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Subject: TV
schedule
Rachele wrote:
> Here is the calendar of TV
events as published by USAG on their Delphi
> BBS:
>
>
EVENT
LOCATION DATE DATE TO
NET TIME
>
HELD BE
AIRED (EDT)
>
World Championship Mens Indiv.
Events. Australia 4/94 4/30/94 ABC 4:30
> NCAA Womens Championships
Salt Lake
4/94 5/8/94 CBS 2:00
> NCAA Womens Championships
Salt Lake
4/94 5/15/94 CBS 2:00
..etc.
Just in case this hasn't been mentioned, they announced at the
NCAA's
that the individual finals would be
broadcast on May 8th and team and
all-around would
be on the 15th (the opposite order of their actual
occurrence).
-Patrick
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 1994 11:35:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: <***@gateway.us.sidwell.edu>
Subject:
Women's AA comments
On Sun, 24 Apr 1994, Lori wrote (part):
>
gimnasta writes:
>
> {comments on Shannon's floor routine}
>
>
> > Gina Gogean's middle pass is
ridiculous, and did anyone notice her routine
> > (at
least the first half) is a Silivas ripoff? Down to
the steps on her
> > heels in the
corner. At least it's an
improvement over her last routine.
>
> I thought it looked
familiar. I thought that both she
and Milosovici
> looked
like that had no desire to be there.
There was absolutely no
> expression in
their routines.
Yeah, plus their music was
awful!! As my father said (during
the last
part of Milosovici's
routine),"It sounds like Led Zepplin."
Milosovici's old music wasn't much better, but I kind of
liked
Gogean's old music.
While we're on this subject...Miller is
in *dire* need of some new
music! So is Borden, if she still has that
celestial-sounding music.
Lisa
------------------------------
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 94 15:07:19 EDT
From: <***@BBN.COM>
Subject: World
comments
I rather enjoyed the 1950's footage (my roommate particularly
enjoyed
the spotter for the women's uneven bars
holding the bars still--and my
how close together
the bars were back then!). Like a
number of
others, I don't mind having old footage
thrown in (although I agree
that 3 times for Dawes
vault from just last year was excessive), as
long
as it doesn't shortchange the current coverage. Unfortunately,
that's
never the case.
There are gymnasts over the years who have struck me
as "blah"-- they
do their stuff, often
very well, but convey no originality or
personality
of any kind, giving the impression that they're robotic
performers
doing their jobs. I'm sorry to say
that Milosovici fits
into
that category for me, and Miller, after leaving it last year, has
gone back into it.
On the other hand, I was disappointed that Dawes
has
let her form get sloppy again.
My roommate award Mo the highest
accolade for her Gaylord on bars (a
reverently
awed "Jesus, what was that?
Roll the tape back so we can
see it
again!"). (He still hasn't
recovered from the girl who did the
Pak salto
release on bars.) Otherwise, we
both noted a general
sameness in the women's floor
routines (all that rather simple front
tumbling,
except for Kochetkova) and the men's high bar (the
double
over the bar is now _the_ release move, it
seems).
What has Scherbo's practice schedule
been like this past year? I
thought he was lucky to do as well last year as he did, and
I wonder
if lack of training was finally catching
to him. The falls were bad
enough, but all those little steps and bobbles were just as
bad;
Scherbo just doesn't do that!
I
agree with Bart Conner that with so many athletes playing the
numbers game--finding the easiest way to get scored from a
10--
the routines start to look more and more
alike, especially on floor.
Someone wondered about Nunno's
strategy in having Miller play this strategy on floor. I don't know the answer, but my
guess
would be that between her growth spurt and
her chronic back problem,
he might have figured
that easing off this year might be best in
keeping
her around until 1996.
I would have liked to have
seen more of Lysenko than a shot of her
walking
in for the AA rotation a few girls ahead of Miller (not
counting
the clip of her on the podium with Miller from last year's
AA), and more of
Fontaine than of her sitting next to Dawes in the
stands
while they watched Miller compete (without even being
identified
for the audience!).
Re: Eurosport being good
(and free): Why is it that in the country
with
arguably the best production skills in the world, a large
population, and all these broadcast networks and cable
channels, we
get at best 25 minutes of women's AA
action in a 90 minute show?
Can
you imagine trying to show a baseball
World Series game that way,
coming in at the 3rd
inning, giving you the score, showing you a few
at-bats,
cutting away for a personality profile on the pitcher,
showing
you clips from the 1952 World Series game, coming back to
mention that interesting things happened in the 5th inning,
but not
showing clips of them, etc., etc.?
In
the footage of men from the 1950's, they showed a guy on high bar
releasing the bar (at about chest level), doing a twist, and
then
regrasping. Out of curiosity, does anyone know what
that skill's
called and its current value?
>>Kathy
------------------------------
Date:
Tue, 26 Apr 94 09:50:33 BST
From: ***@axion.bt.co.uk
Subject: World
comments
>Re: Eurosport being good (and
free): Why is it that in the country
>with arguably the best production skills in the world, a
large
>population, and all these broadcast
networks and cable channels,
>we get at best 25
minutes of women's AA action in a 90 minute show?
I think it helps if
the channel showing the sport has about 6205 hours
of
empty schedules to fill up. Eurosport is a dedicated
sports channel
they show nothing else other than
sport. They also dont need to bother
with the dreaded ratings all the sports they show are
sponsored by
companies who have their adverts on
during the advert breaks. For
example for F1 Grand
Prix coverage of which they show every
qualifying,warm-up,race and specific review programs
and edited
highlights the sponsors are Elf,Good Year, Hitachi,Coca-Cola,Ford.
Then
during the advert break you get adverts from Coca-Cola, Ford etc
etc.
Basically its a simple way of getting exposure all
across Europe
and also if they get the oppurtunity to fill up the schedules then
they do which is why the coverage of events is so
extensive.
Clive.
------------------------------
End
of gymn Digest
******************************